Curriculum Vitae

 

 

Personal Data

 

 

Name                                                Dr. Csaba Hetényi

Year and Country of Birth       1976, Hungary

Present Position                          Bolyai Fellow

                                                            Department of Genetics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary

Web                                                   http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~csaba/

 

 

Education

 

 

PhD       Pharmacy
               Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Hungary, 2002 
               Summa cum laude.

Dissertation: Blind docking: A novel approach of locating binding sites of  potential drugs on macromolecules (Unusual applications of AutoDock)

 

MSc       Qualified Chemist

               Faculty of Science, University of Szeged, Hungary, 1999

               With honours.

Thesis: Synthesis and computer-aided structural analysis of BSB peptides and their interactions with the ß-amyloid peptide of Alzheimer’s disease (in Hungarian)

 

 

Work Experience, Fellowships

 

 

2009-2012       Bolyai Fellow. Sponsor: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Department of Genetics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

2009                  Eötvös Travel Fellowship. Sponsor: Hungarian State.

Molecular Biophysics Group, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Collaborator: Prof. David van der Spoel.

2006-2008      Senior Researcher. Sponsors: Foundation Innove & University of Tartu.

                            Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Estonia.

2005                  Eötvös Travel Fellowship. Sponsor: Hungarian State.

Molecular Biophysics Group, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Collaborator: Prof. David van der Spoel.

2003-2006      Békésy Fellow. Sponsor: Hungarian Ministry of Education.

Department of Biochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

2002-2003             Postdoctoral Fellow. Sponsor: European Union.

Research Training Network: Imagetox.

Department of Chemical Physics, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia.

Collaborators: Prof. Mati Karelson, Dr. Uko Maran.

2000-2001             Researcher. Employer: TRIPEP AB, Huddinge, Sweden.

1999-2000             Researcher. Sponsors: TEMPUS & Swedish Academy of Eng. Sci.

Department of Biochemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Supervisor: Prof. Stellan Hjertén.

1999-2001              PhD student. Sponsor: Hungarian State.

Department of Medical Chemistry, University of Szeged, Hungary.

Supervisor: Prof. Botond Penke.

1999                  Special prize of the Hungarian Chemical Society (for my MSc Thesis).

 

 

Professional Activities

 

 

Reviewing

Teaching

Research

 

 

Funding

 

 

Fellowships

A list of awarded fellowships is provided in Section Work experience, Fellowships.

 

Scientific leadership of project

Modern post-graduate training in molecular technology on international level and improvement of the competitiveness of research and development (No. 1.0101-0310). Sponsors: Innove Foundation (www.innove.ee), and University of Tartu, Estonia.

(2.3 million EEK)

Link: http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~csaba/poster_eng.pdf

 

 

Scientometrics

 

 

Number of Refereed Papers: 22

Number of Patents: 3

Sum of Impact Factors of the Papers: 86

Sum of the Times Cited: 525

Hirsch-index: 13

 

 

 

Research achievements

 

 

Blind docking. Computational molecular docking is one of the most advanced atomic resolution techniques of structural calculation of ligand-target complexes (Allen, Form finds function. Nat Chem Biol, 3, 452-3, 2007). Docking calculations are generally restricted to the close surrounding of the hypothesized binding site. However, there are cases where even the approximate location of the binding site of a ligand is unknown. To extend the docking methodology for these problematic cases, we developed parameters and tested the blind docking (BD) approach for peptide ligands (ARTICLE 5*). During BD the entire surface of the target protein is mapped. BD results both the binding position and conformation of the ligand at atomic resolution. The best sites can be selected due to binding affinity values based on the protein-docked ligand complex structures. BD has been extended and verified for smaller, drug-like ligands and for large protein targets (ARTICLE 15), as well. ARTICLES 5 and 15 were selected for the covers of the respective journals and have already received more than one hundred citations including applications of BD for mapping of e.g. allosteric binding sites. We have also applied the BD approach to develop aggregation inhibitors of the ß-amyloid peptide of Alyheimer’s disease (ARTICLES 4, 6, 11) and for mapping a prerequisite binding site of inhibitor blebbistatin on myosin II (ARTICLE 10).

 

 

Calculation of binding affinity. Precise estimation of equilibrium binding affinity, i.e. the binding free energy (deltaG) of a ligand to a targeted macromolecule is a central issue of structure-based drug discovery. deltaG can be calculated directly from docked ligand-protein complex structures with scoring functions including enthalpic (deltaH) and entropic (deltaS) binding contributions according to deltaG=deltaH–TdeltaS, where T is the thermodynamic temperature. Although there are various deltaG calculators for smaller ligands, the calculation of deltaG for large, peptide ligands is still challenging. Using the deltaH terms of a modified scoring function we calculated the deltadeltaG, i.e. the difference between deltaGs of a large inhibitor peptide bound to two different types of trypsin (ARTICLE 12) and also analyzed the energetic contributions of each amino acid to the peptide-trypsin interactions. Our findings were featured on the cover of the Journal of Molecular Biology. On the basis of these promising results we prepared a comprehensive study on a series of 50 biologically important peptide ligands (ARTICLE 14) using a combination of deltaH terms of the AutoDock3 scoring function and ligand-based molecular descriptors of the deltaS contributions. Excellent correlations were achieved between calculated and experimental deltaG values. In a recent study, we successfully estimated deltaGs (ARTICLE 17) of agonists to an adrenergic receptor target, as well.

 

 Selectivity and efficiency of drugs. High failure rate of drug candidates, inappropriate drug targets, and withdrawal of marketed drugs due to unexpected side-effects and toxicity have become fundamental problems of drug development. Considerable side-effects arise from weak selectivity or promiscuity of the marketed drugs. At the same time, complex approaches such as network pharmacology or poly-pharmacology (Hopkins, Network pharmacology. Nat Biotech, 25, 1110-1, 2007) emphasize the benefits of interactions of a drug with several targets contrary to the “one drug for one target approach” which focuses on the design of highly selective drugs. To address the above issues we introduced (ARTICLE 8) a new measure, the molecular interaction fingerprint (MIF) for qualitative description of selectivity of candidate molecules. Practically, MIF is a vector of deltaGs of a drug candidate for a set of target proteins. MIF is a useful measure for the prediction of unknown (polypharmacological) actions, side-effects and describing cross-interactions of drugs, as well. In a recent paper (ARTICLE 19) we also defined and calculated a series of new efficiency indices (EIs) based on 2D and 3D molecular descriptors of ligand molecules. The EIs are two-in-one measures featuring both pharmaco-dynamic and pharmacokinetic efficiency of drug candidates. We demonstrated the usefulness of our new EI based on the Wiener index for statistical discrimination of drugs from non-drugs in the case where deltaG alone could not discriminate them. Our results indicate the possibility of establishing quantitative thresholds of drug-likeness for EIs similarly to Lipinski’s rule-of-five.

 

 

Structural calculations. In collaborations I have calculated various protein (-ligand) structures using molecular dynamics and docking methods. For example, in a recent study (ARTICLE 20) we investigated the interaction of the 1st PHD finger of human Autoimmune Regulator (AIRE, grey) protein with histone H3 peptide (orange). AIRE plays an important role in Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy Ectodermal Dystrophy (APECED). To explore the molecular basis of this disease I constructed and optimized the AIRE PHD1-H3 complex using structural analogues and molecular dynamics calculations and also studied the effect of methylation. My model was verifyied by heteronuclear NMR mapping of the binding site and mutagenesis studies along with fluorescence spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements. Our results revealed a new role for the PHD finger in the recognition of non-methylated histones which correlates with transcriptional activation mediated by AIRE in vivo. I have also contributed to structural calculations of different myosin systems (ARTICLE 13, 16, 18) and the H-bonding in Schiff bases (ARTICLE 7).

 

 

*As numbered in my List of Publications.

 

 

Teaching achievements

 

 

Course development 1. Title: Introduction to structural modeling of bioactive molecules. Levels: BSc, MSc, PhD. Type: Lectures & Seminars. Language: English. Actively taught: 4 semesters.

Contents. 1) Visualization of macromolecules. Structural editing and comparisons. Programs VMD and PyMol. 2)   An introduction to macromolecular structures. Main features of peptide and protein structures. Experimental sources of structural data of biopolymers (X-ray and NMR). Examples on structural variability. The role of conformational disorders of proteins in the pathomechanism of Alzheimer’s and prion diseases. Myosin, the motor protein: same sequence with different structures. 3) Simple methods for binding site detection and cavity search. Program PASS. 4) Hierarchy of calculation methods. Programs for molecular modeling. 5)  Principles of molecular mechanics (MM). Force fields. Bonding and non-bonding interactions. The general algorithm of MM programs. Program packages. TINKER. 6)  Implicit and explicit solvation models. Hydrophobic interaction. 7) Molecular dynamics (MD). Approximations and benefits of MD vs. experimental structure determination methods. MD program packages. GROMACS. Setting up an MD run. 8)  Sequence alignment and homology modeling: practice and limitations. A path from genomics to proteomics. Receptor modeling. Design of agonists and antagonists. 9)  Docking: a method for searching and engineering of molecular interactions of drug candidates. Program packages: GOLD, AutoDock. Rigid and flexible docking. Blind docking with AutoDock vs. cavity detection methods. 10) An overview of computational methods and strategies of drug design. Calculation of pharmacokinetic (ADMETox) parameters. Computational predictions and structural models of xenobiotics metabolism at CYP 3A4 of cytochrome P450 enzyme family.

Web page: http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~csaba/msc.html

 

 

Course development 2. Title: Molecular interactions in biological systems. Level: PhD. Type: Lectures & Seminars. Language: English. Actively taught: 3 semesters. Contents. 1) Selected principles of classical thermodynamics. 2) Selected principles of statistical thermodynamics. 3) Energy and force (conservativity and additivity). 4) Model potentials. 5) Generation of conformational ensembles with molecular dynamics (MD). 6) The free energy perturbation (FEP) and the thermodynamic integration (TI) methods. 7) The linear interaction energy method (LIE). 8) Scoring and empirical free energy functions of drug binding. 9) Hit-to-lead optimization. Lead-likeness and drug-likeness. 10) Druggability of targets and drug efficiency. Problematic cases of drug design (AIDS, Alzheimer's disease).

Web page: http://hermes.chem.ut.ee/~csaba/phd.html

 

 

Back to the Web Page of Dr. Csaba Hetényi